Skip to content
Back to REMIT cases

Energi Danmark fined again for interconnector capacity hoarding

The Danish Utility Regulator reported Energi Danmark to the police in March 2024 for trading with itself on 3 January 2020 to take up cross-zonal capacity between two bidding zones. The National Unit for Special Crime fined the company DKK 380,000, which it accepted. The regulator counted a 2018 fine for the same conduct as aggravating.

On this page

The decision

Authority
Danish Utility Regulator (Forsyningstilsynet) (DUR), Denmark
Published
28 February 2025
Participants
Energi Danmark A/S
Commodity
Electricity
Market
Cross-zonal intraday capacity between two bidding zones
Conduct period
3 January 2020
REMIT
Article 5 (Market manipulation)
Type of conduct
Capacity hoarding
Penalty
DKK 380,000 (approx. EUR 51,000), accepted
Status
Final

What the regulator found

Forsyningstilsynet, the Danish Utility Regulator, announced on 28 February 2025 that Energi Danmark A/S had accepted a fine of DKK 380,000 for breaching the ban on market manipulation in Article 5 of REMIT. The case began with a police report that the regulator filed in March 2024. The fine itself was set by the National Unit for Special Crime (NSK), not by the regulator.

In the regulator's assessment, Energi Danmark's trading on 3 January 2020 amounted to five cases of market manipulation and one attempt. It describes the practice as capacity hoarding: the company acquired all, or a decisive share, of the capacity on an interconnector between two bidding zones by trading with itself. The regulator says this kept other market participants away from the capacity and created or widened a price difference between the two zones. The release does not name the zones or the interconnector.

How the fine was set

The regulator estimated the company's financial gain from the conduct at about DKK 80,693. The fine imposed was DKK 380,000.

The regulator treated an earlier fine as an aggravating factor. In December 2018 Energi Danmark had accepted a fine of DKK 750,000 for the same type of breach, and the 2025 announcement says the regulator included that in its police report. The announcement does not break the DKK 380,000 down further, and it does not say whether any confiscation was ordered.

What the regulator said

The regulator's director, Carsten Smidt, said that the conduct harms competition in cross-border energy markets, which can in the end raise the prices consumers pay. He added that the regulator hopes the case helps energy companies understand which trades are allowed under REMIT.

This account rests on the regulator's public announcement. It links neither the NSK fine notice nor the regulator's police report; those underlying documents were not located for this review. The release does not give a fuller penalty calculation.

For a surveillance function

The regulator's account connects self-trading with its effect on scarce cross-zonal capacity and other participants' access. Its police report also treated the earlier sanction for the same type of conduct as aggravating; neither the company's trading purpose alone nor the orders in isolation explained the case.

Sources

Sources read on 27 October 2026. This page restates what the authority published and adds no finding of its own. A decision under appeal is not final, and its status may have changed since: check the source before relying on it.

Continue reading